Friday, May 19, 2006

Report To Deport


Listening some more to different opinions on what to do, on how to solve the “immigrant problem,” I heard this one guy, speaking for the Minute Men, say that he thinks the right and fair way to do this, is to get all the undocumented to report to the Department of Homeland Security and register. Those who report will be given a specified amount of time in which to “settle” all their affairs and “liquidate” all their assets and leave the U.S. for good. Those who do not report and register, if and when caught, will lose everything and be deported immediately.

Let me get this straight- you want people that are currently living “under the radar” to willingly come to this agency, give up everything they have and just walk away from a lifetime of work and whatever hardships they’ve overcome? I wonder what this minute man’s idea of a “fair amount of time” may be. Three months? Six? That’s probably too generous. Who would benefit from this arrangement but the people that would buy properties and life possessions at an otherwise non-available low price anyway? Let’s not forget though; the illegals shouldn’t be here to begin with: end of argument.

Let’s do forget that some of our own, long-enforced policies are the very cause of the current migration patterns. Let’s forget that some of the countries that are currently producing the largest number of migrants are the very same countries whom our policies- economic and military- irrevocably damaged.

I once spoke to this lawyer about legal status and such. His position was so irrational it left me wanting to pummel him, but hey, violence is not the way- I know. He claimed that people here illegally had no right to ask for anything regardless of their background and/or reason for being here. He said being here is akin to walking into a bank and robbing it simply because the bank did not lock their front door. “What are you talking about?!?” I managed to ask him. He continued with his ridiculous analogies further equating illegal entry to the U.S. with other crimes that had not a shred of relation to the subject then at hand.

The amusing thing is that these rather radical thinkers equate the U.S.’s position to that of Israel and their “prevention of terrorist attacks.” I won’t delve into that since I’m no Middle East expert at all nor can I pretend to be one- even for this post. I’d like to see the numbers of terrorists that have, to date, infiltrated the U.S. through the Mexican border. Fact is; most people crossing are looking for jobs and to otherwise escape unlivable conditions. Should other projects be started to cause people to stay home and make a go of it? Yes, certainly. Migration as it stands today is destroying small towns, communities and families at the core level. Without a core base there is nothing. It’s all intertwined. People want to feed their families, they need a job, and they need money. Money that is not available to them locally. Parents are leaving their children at an alarming rate. Children are venturing to the U.S. and dying along the way. Fencing the border will not work, people are desperate enough -they will find an entry point every time. Until corruption can be somewhat mitigated and the economies of these flailing countries rebuilt in some sort of meaningful way, there will be no true reduction of incoming people looking for better opportunities.

I specially like how this whole campaign to seal the border is pimped out under the guise of patriotism. Do they not see the hypocrisy of it all? Where was all this land love when they illegally, forcibly “removed” countless Mexican families from their rightfully owned land? There is too much history not taken into account here. The U.S. sits on its high moral horse when it comes to disciplining and making other nations “do the right thing,” but they continue avoiding to clearly and rightfully address their own.

Yes, let’s make Lebanon apologize and financially compensate the families of that flight. Let’s make Swedish banks distribute the confiscated wealth of the Jewish population during Hitler’s reign of terror. Let’s do all that, it is the right thing to do.

So these people that are supposed to take up the great offer of reporting for deporting? I think they’ll take their chances, don’t you?

What's Not To Love




The Queen City Rocks! You all...

Friday, May 05, 2006

Boycotting "Ceenko Duh Maio"


Since immigration policy or lack thereof has been on the news- lots of people have been talking about it incessantly; mostly around work where a lot of us spend long hours with people we wouldn’t necessarily hang out with otherwise. It’s amusing to hear some of the conversations though. Specially the part when the speaker censors him/herself depending on who is standing by the proverbial water cooler. If there are “Latinos” around then, they don’t say things like “they should all go back to where they came from”- the person abstains from giving a forceful opinion.

I was sitting at my neighborhood bar last Sunday, day of the Lord, and this guy was saying how all “they” want is free services and welfare and all that. How misinformed can you possibly be? Where do these “facts” come from? I couldn’t resist- I had to jump in and tell him that that was not in fact what these demonstrations have been about at all. All- most of the undocumented immigrants- want by and large is to be able to work without having to continually worry about whether “la migra” is coming for them that day or the next. Furthermore, what brought on these demonstrations was the passing of the bill that says that any undocumented person within the U.S is now a felon. I used to work in a Doctor’s office in a highly immigrant area of town in Atlanta. The Doctor was Chinese; his clientele was made up of Korean, Vietnamese and Spanish people, relatively new to the U.S. The majority of these people paid cash. Every time.

Granted, there are many mothers I’ve seen using the WIC program for their children born here, but there are also a large number of undocumented people paying federal, state, Medicare and social security taxes into a pot they will never collect from. This should more than cover the services other undocumented immigrants are dipping into. Speaking strictly of Mexican immigrants, I remember reading about a program between the U.S. and Mexico in the 1940’s for guest workers, where millions of dollars were placed into some sort of trust that these workers were supposed to be able to collect from after their term in the U.S. ended and those funds were never paid out. Where is that money? Where is the money these people using false documentation are paying? Where is the money employers are matching for these false documents?

Why are we only focusing on the one side of this story? Why, with all the available information out there, are we still relying on sources whose only purpose is to divide, inflame and wrongly sway public opinion? Is it really human nature I wonder?

GH’s co-worker just informed him that she is boycotting “Cinco De Mayo.” This in solidarity with all real Americans I suppose, to “show that America’s still in charge,” she said. That’s right; don’t drink any margaritas or tequila shots. Don’t get wasted at your local Mexican joint, that’ll show ‘em! Fuckin’ Messicans.

Yes, America is great, there are great people here, and it is a great country where opportunity abounds. But we didn’t get here through all good means. How we got here isn’t as simple as building a 700’ wall. It isn’t as easy as rounding them all up and placing them on outbound planes, buses and trains. It is a long, at times unpleasant history that cannot be ignored. It is, at the risk of sounding dramatic, destiny. What else did we expect to happen?

Hot Bike Messengers


Thursday, May 04, 2006

Misconceptions

They’re out there. Everywhere, everyday- they are inevitable. Why do most of us fall into them, aid them and abet them? Because we’re trained to do so, relentlessly preached to- daily. Was that redundant? Good.

Like my cousin for instance: he is under the impression that riding a bike is embarrassing. He’ll drive a death-trap-jalopy-with-expired-tags-and-incontrollable-exhaust-problems (which landed him in the eslammer), but he can’t be seen riding a bike because somehow that diminishes his manhood. WTF? Apparently it is very uncool to ride a bike to places in Miami, which I find curious ‘cause I just read an article that stated that Miami is one of the listed “bike-friendly” cities in the country. How is riding a bike worse than driving a jalopy? And what exactly is “manhood” to him I wonder. Isn’t manhood the capability of handling your own business honorably to the best of your abilities? Isn’t it respecting others as you’d like to be respected? What do I know though, I don’t have a penis- remember? Some of the hottest dudes I’ve ever seen are avid bike-riders, riding to work, errands and stuff. And part of the “hotness” isn’t only the fact that they are usually in much better physical shape than your average car-driving dude (jalopy or newest released vehicle), but their seemingly relaxed outlook on Life, from the relaxed clothes to the attitude. Maybe I’ve just met the really cool guys that bike.

Like dressing for the office- in Atlanta the big-whigs do not allow anything less than “business casual” when it comes to dress policy (according to their Memos)- and business casual varies just a little bit based on the various outfit chosen by the the little people running around there. Countless times the big-whigs have sent out highly urgent memos; which are heeded for about a week after their distribution date; detailing what ladies can and cannot wear to work. Still some “ladies” insist on wearing their “club shoes” up into the Bank, and others insist on sporting their house-shoes while at the Bank- one in particular used to just go around barefoot. Ewwwwh. Noone wants to see your freaky-ass toe ring and irisdescent purple toe-paint. Please! Can’t we instate a closed-toe shoe policy in here? I mean, already it's forbidden for people to wear tank-tops, isn’t forbidding open toe shoes and sandals the next obvious move? Does it really matter what people wear in the end though? Does a suit make you a better banker? Full disclosure: I do have a soft spot for a man in an immaculate suit, down to the cufflinks and the buffed shoes- NO tassels though- ever. But realistically speaking, it seems- and again feeding my own misconceptions- that a guy that needs that much time simply to cover his nakedness EVERY morning would just be- not my type at the end of the day.

Like dating people and stuff- just ‘cause I’m sleeping with you doesn’t mean I love you, and conversely just ‘cause I love you doesn’t mean I’ll sleep with you. I mean who keeps reinforcing these misconceptions, oh yeah- I do it too. Damn! I’m gonna quit though- I swear. How does dating get so complicated? I think it’s due, in part, to all those estoopid books and “advise” out there. And then there are the people dating, reinforcing these misconceptions every step of the way. I won’t call her for a week- that’ll make her want me. Yeah? That’ll make me want to punch you next time I see you. Did I mention I’m a little bit violent? Vas once said to me; “I was told to always leave them wanting more.” That, after my observing that he wasn’t putting out enough. Who in the world would say that to him? And why? Perhaps a bitter friend or ex, trying to stunt his emotional and overall growth as a man thru copious sexcapades? If I were a guy, my motto would be to always leave them so satisfied, that they would barely keep their hands off of me the next time they saw me. Then again, I’d do so many things differently if I were a guy. Why, I could even stand over any toilet I ever encountered if I were a guy, don’t you know?